Re: git revisited

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: git revisited
Date: 2009-07-21 13:21:43
Message-ID: 200907211621.44187.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Monday 20 July 2009 23:17:30 Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I'm not sure where we got to with doing some surgery on the CVS repo so
> that we can replicate all the tags and branches properly. Has someone
> fully identified what needs to be fixed so we can have all the tags?

I think this depends on which tool we would end up using to do the final
conversion. Each tool has its own quirks.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-07-21 13:46:25 Re: pg_restore --clean vs. large object
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-07-21 13:13:41 Re: Sampling profiler updated