On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 06:43:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 01:28:01PM -0700, Nathan Boley wrote:
> >> ... They dismiss singular value decomposition and the discrete
> >> wavelet transform as being too parametric ( which is silly, IMHO
> >> )
> > Should we have a separate discussion about eigenvalues? Wavelets?
> I think it'd be a short discussion: what will you do with
> non-numeric datatypes? We probably don't really want to assume
> anything stronger than that the datatype has a total ordering.
That sounds about like the discussion we needed unless we later decide
we need to do something special for approximations of R^n :)
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Greg Stark||Date: 2009-06-29 23:16:24|
|Subject: Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-06-29 22:49:54|
|Subject: Re: Query progress indication - an implementation |