| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code |
| Date: | 2008-09-04 07:57:06 |
| Message-ID: | 200809040957.10755.dfontaine@hi-media.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Le jeudi 04 septembre 2008, Robert Treat a écrit :
> To paraphrase, "if you can't write a config file correctly before
> restarting, I do not want you anywhere near any instance of a production
> system"
Do you really want to TCO of PostgreSQL to raise that much when the software
could help lowering it?
If you're a shop where you can't have only experts in any given domain do
level 1 nightly "fix", maybe you'd still like them to be able to follow some
procedures involving server config change.
On what grounds are you wanting this not to be possible?
Regards,
--
dim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2008-09-04 08:07:19 | Re: New FSM patch |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2008-09-04 05:52:06 | Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code |