Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)


From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, y-asaba(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp,postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP
Date: 2008-07-10 00:06:19
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 04:43:27PM -0400, Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
> * David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> [080709 14:45]:
> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 09:28:34PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > In fact, I fail to see the point of you providing the repo if
> > > the upstream guys are apparently not using it ...
> > 
> > It's *very* early days to be dismissing git entirely.  We don't
> > have auths fixed up yet, and I contend that that's because the
> > people who have sudo on the git machine are unwilling to create
> > git-shell accounts for people who need them.
> I don't think that was intended to dismiss git entirely, but only
> question what the point of this particular git repo/branch is for:
> Is it just to provide an alternative way to fetch the patch?  I
> would have thought that anybody who can compile PostgreSQL from
> source can apply a patch (if the patch available and applies
> cleanly).
> The with_recursive branch doesn't seem to provide any of the nice
> goodies that git could provide (i.e.  patch history, merge
> corresponding to various versions so you can easily see what
> changed, etc)

I'm really new to this git thing, but I now have access to create
git-shell accounts, etc. on  Any ideas you can
offer on how better to handle this would really help me. :)

David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres:

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HodgesDate: 2008-07-10 00:55:25
Subject: Follow-up on replication hooks for PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-07-09 21:01:03
Subject: Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Greg SmithDate: 2008-07-10 01:39:29
Subject: Re: Sorting writes during checkpoint
Previous:From: Aidan Van DykDate: 2008-07-09 20:43:27
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group