Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: libpq Win32 Mutex performance patch

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libpq Win32 Mutex performance patch
Date: 2008-04-15 08:00:06
Message-ID: 20080415100006.62eb0166@mha-laptop (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Andrew Chernow wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>  >It changes the behavior when the pointer passed in is invalid from
>  >crash to silent working, right?
> Correct, it a Habit.  I sub-consciously write code that checks
> pointers. We can remove the pointer checks and let the thing dump
> core if people prefer.

Actually, if we can avoid it being a pointer at all, that'd be even
better :-) Because if we don't send a pointer we have to allocate, then
the critical section functions have the same properties as the pthread
ones, namely they cannot fail. Any chance for that way instead?


In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2008-04-15 08:07:55
Subject: Re: libpq Win32 Mutex performance patch
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-04-14 23:57:53
Subject: Re: explicit tracking of ActiveSnapshot

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group