Re: pg_dump -i wording

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump -i wording
Date: 2008-03-25 18:04:37
Message-ID: 200803251804.m2PI4bA07117@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I have developed the attached patch with improves wording for the
> > pg_dump -i (ignore version) option.
>
> I think this is going in exactly the wrong direction --- it makes
> both the documentation and the warning message less scary not more
> so.

OK, updated pg_dump -i wording, more scary.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
/pgpatches/pg_dump text/x-diff 7.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-25 18:05:57 Re: Text <-> C string
Previous Message Sam Mason 2008-03-25 17:57:21 Re: writing a MIN(RECORD) aggregate

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-25 18:05:57 Re: Text <-> C string
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-03-25 17:45:52 Re: Text <-> C string