From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, "sathiya psql" <sathiya(dot)psql(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: migration of 7.4 to 8.1 |
Date: | 2008-03-13 05:56:40 |
Message-ID: | 20080312225640.2372f251@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:50:21 -0700
"Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> And if the OP is worried about running too new a version of pgsql,
> 8.2.6 is very mature. But if he's got 6 or more months until he goes
> live, which is common, I'd recommend going to 8.3 which will be well
> polished by then.
>
I would avoid 8.3 without extensive testing. 8.2.6 is likely a better
shot a minimizing one off incompatibilities.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL political pundit | Mocker of Dolphins
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH2MIYATb/zqfZUUQRAqeiAKCjPXAW3OJ0zSq2edapaCjGTg6vxwCdG9lm
BPmOR332+20LivOz6SE+FIE=
=0Sfu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pietro | 2008-03-13 09:20:07 | LAN connection to server only after restart server |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-03-13 05:50:21 | Re: migration of 7.4 to 8.1 |