Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation
Date: 2007-11-11 05:14:59
Message-ID: 200711110514.lAB5ExN19424@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> >> BTW, why are neither contrib/dblink nor contrib/spi included in the
> >> conversion?
>
> > I see dblink:
> > http://momjian.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/dblink.html
>
> Oh, in that case the question is why the contrib/db/doc/ files are
> still there.

Because I thought only READMEs were converted. Removed now.

> > I assume spi wasn't done because it is just examples of SPI usage.
>
> The .example files are fine, but what about the two README files?

My guess is they were not converted because they are READMEs that
related to the examples. We can convert them if people want.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Albert Cervera i Areny 2007-11-11 13:05:19 Re: Contrib docs v1
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-11-11 04:48:59 Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation