Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Improvement of procArray.xmin for VACUUM

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improvement of procArray.xmin for VACUUM
Date: 2007-03-27 13:19:40
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Uh, no, that's not very clear.  A long-running transaction will be a
> >> VACUUM bottleneck because of its own XID, never mind its xmin.
> > Well, my secondary addition was to start MyProc->xmin with the current
> > xid counter, rather than your own xid.
> Don't tell me you seriously believe that would work.

I do.  Please tell me why it will not.

  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-03-27 13:56:04
Subject: Re: patch adding new regexp functions
Previous:From: starkDate: 2007-03-27 12:32:04
Subject: Patch for circular buffer in tuplestore to optimize merge joins (v1)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group