Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com>, Rich Teer <rich(dot)teer(at)rite-group(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
Date: 2007-02-26 15:21:23
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> > There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any
> > comments.
> The actual answer to the question "Can I compile PostgreSQL with 
> Kerberos v5 support?" is "Yes, why not?".  I don't think "Can I use 
> this weird internal private library that seems to provide a similar 
> interface?" is a "Frequently Asked Question".

I don't use Solaris so I don't know if it is frequent issue or not.
I assume the author knows.

  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-02-26 17:43:12
Subject: Re: BUG #3079: pg_dump doesn't dump datascheme with uppercase letters in
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-02-26 14:46:24
Subject: Re: BUG #3059: psql to 'postgres' shortcut

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2007-02-26 17:33:13
Subject: 1-byte packed varlena headers
Previous:From: NikhilSDate: 2007-02-26 13:36:37
Subject: Re: Recalculating OldestXmin in a long-running vacuum

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group