Re: [PERFORM] Direct I/O issues

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Direct I/O issues
Date: 2006-11-23 17:20:58
Message-ID: 200611231720.kANHKwa16285@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-performance

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I have applied your test_fsync patch for 8.2. Thanks.
>
> ... which means test_fsync is now broken. Why did you apply a patch
> when the author pointed out that the program isn't working?

I thought his code was OK, but the OS had issues. Clearly we need to
update test_fsync.c because it doesn't match the code. I have reverted
the patch but some day we need a fixed version.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Schiltknecht 2006-11-23 17:26:12 Re: [Replica-hooks-discuss] Integrating Replication ino
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-11-23 17:10:30 Re: Vacuum columns in statistics tables

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2006-11-23 18:09:54 Re: Direct I/O issues
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-11-23 16:49:29 Re: [PERFORM] Direct I/O issues

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2006-11-23 18:09:54 Re: Direct I/O issues
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-11-23 16:49:29 Re: [PERFORM] Direct I/O issues