Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Replication documentation addition

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
Subject: Re: Replication documentation addition
Date: 2006-10-26 19:06:13
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
On Thursday 26 October 2006 10:45, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 05:46:33PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > So, like   That would
> > > work.
> >
> > Yes.
> I like that idea, but I think that the URL needs to be decided upon,
> needs to be stable, and needs to be put into the docs.  (I don't see
> it ATM, I guess because the URL isn't chosen yet?)  We get so many
> questions about "what replication system" that I'm sure people are
> looking for outlines.
> A

Unfortunately the techdocs system won't support a url like the one above, 
rather you'll end up with something more like the following which is the "GUI Tools Guide" 
(which is linked in the FAQ fwiw).  Once it is in place, it will be stable 

Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-10-26 19:41:39
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition
Previous:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2006-10-26 18:27:33
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-10-26 19:07:03
Subject: Re: Nasty btree deletion bug
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2006-10-26 18:57:09
Subject: Re: plperl/plperlu interaction

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group