From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] New XML section for documentation |
Date: | 2006-08-26 18:38:43 |
Message-ID: | 200608262038.44279.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter wrote:
> We claim SQL standard compliance,
No, we don't. And SQL conformance doesn't require you to implement all
parts anyway.
> so since those are part of
> SQL:2003, we probably ought to mention them. SQL/PSM is a
> programming language that lives inside the database, and DB2 and
> MySQL have it. SQL/MED lets people talk to other data stores.
> SQL/OLB appears to be derived from equel, which we have as ecpg.
> SQL/Schemata contains the information schema. SQL/JRT appears to
> bear some similarity to PL/Java and PL/J.
It's pretty useless to talk about stuff that we don't have yet. The
point of the XML section is that we have a number of things, and users
are having trouble (understandably) fitting them together.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-08-26 18:41:32 | Re: New XML section for documentation |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-26 17:31:20 | Re: [HACKERS] New XML section for documentation |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-08-26 18:41:32 | Re: New XML section for documentation |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-08-26 18:35:02 | Re: Autovacuum on by default? |