Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] Magic block for modules

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Magic block for modules
Date: 2006-05-31 06:44:16
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:20:33PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Now that the magic-block patch is in, we need to revisit this bit of the
> discussion.  I'm for making lack of a magic block an ERROR immediately.
> I don't see the point of waiting; in fact, if we wait till freeze we'll
> just make the breakage more concentrated.  At the very least it ought
> to be a WARNING immediately, because a LOG message is just not visible
> enough.

If you like I can send a patch that adds it to all of contrib and some
of the other places required so that make check passes...

Have a nice day,
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2006-05-31 07:22:20
Subject: Re: plperl's ppport.h out of date?
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2006-05-31 06:30:03
Subject: Re: LinkedIn

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-05-31 09:33:59
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for GnuTLS
Previous:From: uolDate: 2006-05-30 22:54:19
Subject: Re: PL/PGSQL: Dynamic Record Introspection

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group