Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems
Date: 2005-09-29 06:36:22
Message-ID: 200509290836.23660.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Am Mittwoch, 28. September 2005 18:10 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
> If it was that bad, we should have fixed it during development, not
> during beta. The only reason it is getting attention now is because it
> is triggered more by a new feature we are adding, a feature we can
> easily remove.

That was my thinking. The issue has probably been there since 7.3. I don't
think we need to shove in a solution now, especially when there is so much
disagreement about the behavior.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-09-29 06:38:47 Re: Added documentation about caching, reliability
Previous Message Ron Peacetree 2005-09-29 06:21:10 Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2005-09-29 07:58:13 Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-09-29 02:53:42 Re: Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems