From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems |
Date: | 2005-09-29 06:36:22 |
Message-ID: | 200509290836.23660.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Am Mittwoch, 28. September 2005 18:10 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
> If it was that bad, we should have fixed it during development, not
> during beta. The only reason it is getting attention now is because it
> is triggered more by a new feature we are adding, a feature we can
> easily remove.
That was my thinking. The issue has probably been there since 7.3. I don't
think we need to shove in a solution now, especially when there is so much
disagreement about the behavior.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-09-29 06:38:47 | Re: Added documentation about caching, reliability |
Previous Message | Ron Peacetree | 2005-09-29 06:21:10 | Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2005-09-29 07:58:13 | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-09-29 02:53:42 | Re: Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems |