Re: Select performance vs. mssql

From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Select performance vs. mssql
Date: 2005-05-25 00:20:39
Message-ID: 20050525002039.GA27519@mathom.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 04:35:14PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>Pretty much. There has been discussion about allowing index-only access to
>"frozen" tables, i.e. archive partitions. But it all sort of hinges on
>someone implementing it and testing ....

Is there any way to expose the planner estimate? For some purposes it's
enough to just give a rough ballpark (e.g., a google-esque "results 1-10
of approximately 10000000") so a user knows whether its worth even
starting to page through.

Mike Stone

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John A Meinel 2005-05-25 00:38:08 Re: Select performance vs. mssql
Previous Message PFC 2005-05-25 00:14:01 Re: Select performance vs. mssql