From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments |
Date: | 2005-04-04 00:59:21 |
Message-ID: | 20050404005921.GX53309@decibel.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:08:54PM -0000, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> Quoting Tom Lane:
> > I thought the "S" suggestion was much better than this.
> >
> > Personally I am not unhappy with the existing behavior, because (unlike
> > Greg I guess) I use \df and \do to look at system definitions all the
> > time. However I'm willing to accept \dfS on the grounds of symmetry
> > with the behavior for tables. I don't really want to put up with a less
> > convenient behavior *and* a gratuitously different syntax.
FWIW, the pg_sysview project is doing user and all variants of system
views, ie: pg_user_tables and pg_all_tables. I also wish there was a way
to get just user functions. I like the idea of \dfS, and if you also
wanted to be able to see all functions listed together, a \dfA (for all)
doesn't seem unreasonable.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Euler Taveira de Oliveira | 2005-04-04 01:03:35 | Re: Recursive SQL |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-04-04 00:50:14 | Re: psql and mysql |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2005-04-04 04:35:02 | Re: unused variable ShmemBootstrap |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-03 17:13:09 | Re: Transitive Closure and 'pg_inherits' |