Re: logging as inserts

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: logging as inserts
Date: 2005-03-02 04:44:04
Message-ID: 200503012344.04582.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday 01 March 2005 18:16, Gavin Sherry wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am looking at having one of our guys write up the code to allow
> > logging as insert statements. I have a couple of questions.
> >
> > What would we like the postgresql.conf option to be? I was thinking
> > log_statements_as_inserts = (t/f)
> >
> > However I thought that was getting a little silly. Also do we want
> > to allow logging as inserts for all options? There is a lot of different
> > types of logging we can do.
>
> Seems to me that a better approach is a script which, given the log file
> format, is able to parse and allow the user to format the insert
> themselves.
>

Doesn't the Practical Query Analysis project already do this? (It's up on
pgfoundry for anyone interested)

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2005-03-02 05:12:41 Re: mysterious log output
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-03-02 04:31:19 Re: snprintf causes regression tests to fail