Tom Lane wrote:
> I just noticed that our port/getopt_long.c substitute implementation
> does not accept abbreviated names for long options:
That is known, but since we don't advertise that feature, it's not a
> Barring objections, I'm going to modify our version to allow unique
> abbreviations too.
Sure, if you like.
> Should it be gettext'ified?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2005-02-01 10:02:52|
|Subject: Re: Allow GRANT/REVOKE permissions to be applied to all|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2005-02-01 09:53:48|
|Subject: Re: 7.2.7 -> 8.0.1 Bundles Ready ...|