Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Vote on Omar Design

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>,Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Vote on Omar Design
Date: 2004-11-19 19:19:21
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> My understanding was that the vote was to actually get Omar's design in 
> place. It is also my understanding that Omar's design works with the 
> existing framework (code etc..). That means, in theory that we could 
> have a new design in place with a reasonable amount of work.

The thing is, we already have a new design 
( ... so its not 'a design' that is 
holding things up ...

Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-11-19 19:30:34
Subject: Re: Vote on Omar Design
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-11-19 19:07:44
Subject: Re: Vote on Omar Design

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group