From: | "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim(at)contactbda(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: beta 1 failed on linux mipsel |
Date: | 2004-08-30 17:13:27 |
Message-ID: | 20040830171130.M90360@contactbda.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom,
I have confirmed that 7.4.3 works on the cobalt raq mipsel system. I have not looked at the s_lock.[ch] code as I
have not coded in C for years and don't know the backend code very well. Do you have any ideas?
Jim
---------- Original Message -----------
From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jim(at)contactbda(dot)com
Cc: "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:42:57 -0400
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] beta 1 failed on linux mipsel
> "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim(at)contactbda(dot)com> writes:
> > Shouldn't this also work on mipsel CPU's?
>
> It should work on a real MIPS CPU. The PlayStation 2 has a dumbed-down
> MIPS chip without the TAS instruction :-(, but now that we've eliminated
> that point I think you've found a problem. We made several
> reorganizations in the spinlock code between 7.4 and 8.0 that could
> possibly have broken the platforms we were not testing on --- can you
> take a look at the changes in s_lock.h and s_lock.c and see where we
> went wrong?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
------- End of Original Message -------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-30 17:23:03 | Re: beta 1 failed on linux mipsel |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2004-08-30 16:45:13 | Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates |