Re: [HACKERS] Spinlock support for linux-hppa?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Spinlock support for linux-hppa?
Date: 2004-01-02 05:15:14
Message-ID: 200401020515.i025FEe17756@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> ... copy the slock_t definition for hppa from hpux.h into linux.h ...
>
> > I think he also has to modify src/include/port/linux.h to support the HP
> > processor.
>
> That's what I said, I thought.

Oh, I saw slock_t definition and thought s_lock.h.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Elphick 2004-01-02 08:55:18 Re: [HACKERS] Spinlock support for linux-hppa?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-01-02 03:32:24 Re: [HACKERS] Spinlock support for linux-hppa?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-01-02 06:09:12 Re: PL/Java issues
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-01-02 04:56:33 Re: time format