Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Thoughts on maintaining 7.3

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>,"scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Thoughts on maintaining 7.3
Date: 2003-10-02 19:15:33
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 10:47:06 -0700,
  "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello,
>  Possible scenario for maintaining 7.3:
>  Only one or two committers  using a two stage cvs... one stage for 
> testing (not including sandbox), one stage for commit.
>  Scheduled releases based on non-critical fixes. Quarterly? Of course 
> critical fixes should be released as soon as plausible.
>  Separate mailing list for 7.3 issues, concerns etc... Which would help 
> develop it's own temporary community.
> Thoughts?

It might be better to split into two different trees. One just gets bug fixes,
the other gets bug fixes plus enhancements that won't require an initdb.

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Dror MatalonDate: 2003-10-02 19:15:47
Subject: count(*) slow on large tables
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-10-02 19:10:46
Subject: Re: Large block size problems and notes...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group