Re: Thoughts on maintaining 7.3

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Thoughts on maintaining 7.3
Date: 2003-10-02 19:15:33
Message-ID: 20031002191533.GA18417@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 10:47:06 -0700,
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Possible scenario for maintaining 7.3:
>
> Only one or two committers using a two stage cvs... one stage for
> testing (not including sandbox), one stage for commit.
> Scheduled releases based on non-critical fixes. Quarterly? Of course
> critical fixes should be released as soon as plausible.
>
> Separate mailing list for 7.3 issues, concerns etc... Which would help
> develop it's own temporary community.
>
> Thoughts?

It might be better to split into two different trees. One just gets bug fixes,
the other gets bug fixes plus enhancements that won't require an initdb.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dror Matalon 2003-10-02 19:15:47 count(*) slow on large tables
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-10-02 19:10:46 Re: Large block size problems and notes...