Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [BUGS] Bug #718: request for improvement of /? to show

From: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Ian Barwick <barwick(at)gmx(dot)net>, Harald Armin Massa <ghum(at)gmx(dot)net>,PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Bug #718: request for improvement of /? to show
Date: 2002-12-11 19:26:50
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:27:05PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > OK, new output attached.  Does the HTML section look silly now with only
> > two entries?
> Yeah.  I think it should be folded into "Formatting", since it really is
> only an output-formatting option.
> I have a problem with the "Query Buffer" section, also: I don't think
> \i, \o, etc have anything to do with the query buffer.  Could we split

In fact, I wish \i _did_ interact with the query buffer: it'd make \e
a lot more useful, IMHO.


In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2002-12-11 19:57:12
Subject: Re: psql's \d commands --- end of the line for 1-character identifiers?
Previous:From: Ross J. ReedstromDate: 2002-12-11 18:20:59
Subject: pgsql ALTER command tab completion

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group