Re: SQLCODE==-209

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: John Summerfield <pgtest(at)os2(dot)ami(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQLCODE==-209
Date: 2001-10-16 15:03:34
Message-ID: 200110161503.f9GF3Y129274@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches

> On Thu, 11 Oct 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>
> >
> > I have added documentation for code 209. Looks like there are other
> > undocumented ones. Should we document them all?
>
> If you're asking me, I'm all in favour of documenting them;-)
>
> I'm not a fan of "Read the source," though I do it if I'm desperate.

I can easily document them all if it would help people. Seems you can't
really test error codes in your app unless you know the codes.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-10-16 15:28:38 Re: Bug #478: Integer overflow in pg_dump
Previous Message Eric 2001-10-16 14:40:34 Dumps/Reloads

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Kreen 2001-10-16 18:21:02 pgcrypto in HISTORY
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-10-16 14:34:48 Re: IPv6 Support for INET/CIDR types.