Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Vacuum and Transactions

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Trewern, Ben" <Ben(dot)Trewern(at)mowlem(dot)com>, "'pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuum and Transactions
Date: 2001-07-06 18:42:39
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
> In 7.2, VACUUM will not require an exclusive lock.

Care to elaborate on that?  How are you going to do it?

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-07-06 18:45:46
Subject: Re: Vacuum and Transactions
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-07-06 18:33:36
Subject: Re: FE/BE protocol oddity

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-07-06 18:43:44
Subject: Re: HUPing a database
Previous:From: Philip MolterDate: 2001-07-06 17:54:44
Subject: Re: HUPing a database

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group