Re: Australian timezone configure option

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Chris Dunlop <chris(at)onthe(dot)net(dot)au>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Australian timezone configure option
Date: 2001-06-12 16:52:22
Message-ID: 200106121652.f5CGqMZ20608@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I found I didn't need to clear the date cache.
> >>
> >> Hmm, are you sure about that? I'm not.
>
> > I checked and it caches a pointer to the struct, not the values
> > themselves, and we don't change the structure, just the secondary values
> > and not the key used by the bsearch.
>
> Now I'm going to object LOUDLY. You cannot convince me that the above
> is a good implementation --- it's a complete crock, and will break the
> instant someone looks at it sidewise.
>
> My inclination would actually be to rip out the cache entirely. bsearch
> in a table this size is not so expensive that we need to bypass it, nor
> is it apparent that we are going to see lots of successive lookups for
> the same keyword anyway. How long has that cache been in there, and
> what was the motivation for adding it to begin with?

I see the CACHE coming in with:

1.42 (thomas 16-Feb-00): #define USE_DATE_CACHE 1

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-12 16:55:04 Re: Patch to include PAM support...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-06-12 16:44:57 Re: Patch to include PAM support...

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-12 16:55:04 Re: Patch to include PAM support...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-06-12 16:44:57 Re: Patch to include PAM support...