Re: libpq++

From: "J(dot) T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)cistron-office(dot)nl>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "J(dot) T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)cistron-office(dot)nl>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libpq++
Date: 2001-03-07 23:13:31
Message-ID: 20010308001331.J3900@cistron.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

On Wed, 07 Mar 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> No, you shouldn't take it. For one thing, Peter E. has been
> reorganizing the configure/build process, and that has impacted pretty
> nearly everything. The changes aren't likely to be extensive, but you'd
> still be facing a merge task when you are ready to submit diffs. Seems
> like you might as well try to avoid that by starting from something more
> current than 7.0.3.
>
> 7.1beta5 would probably be a reasonable starting point.

Whew--thanks! Indeed, I'm just reading through the CVS overview and I see it
now.

Downloadink 7.1b5 & lookink forward to more merging...

Jeroen

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Timothy H. Keitt 2001-03-08 00:03:26 unbuffered results from libpq?
Previous Message J. T. Vermeulen 2001-03-07 23:02:50 Re: libpq++