Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (Makefile README pg_dumpaccounts.sh)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ned Lilly <ned(at)greatbridge(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (Makefile README pg_dumpaccounts.sh)
Date: 2000-11-02 21:54:44
Message-ID: 200011022154.QAA13337@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I want it removed from 7.1 /contrib. I will do that now myself.
>
> Looks like Peter has already eliminated the need for it for 7.1 ;-).
> What remains to discuss is just whether we want it as a contrib item
> in 7.0.3.
>
> As several people mentioned, it's harmless enough in contrib. I'm
> mainly objecting on principle --- this should've been done with more
> attention to protocol.

Totally agree, and I made that point clear to GB staff. Hopefully Jan
will read this when he gets online and know about it too. I will phone
him now to update him on the issues.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-11-02 22:01:23 Re: relation ### modified while in use
Previous Message Matthew 2000-11-02 21:51:39 RE: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message momjian 2000-11-02 22:04:52 pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (Makefile README pg_dumpaccounts.sh)
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2000-11-02 21:51:30 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (Makefile README pg_dumpaccounts.sh)