From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | David Warnock <david(at)sundayta(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Interbase replacement |
Date: | 1999-12-22 18:30:57 |
Message-ID: | 199912221830.NAA20421@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> Hi,
>
> We use Postgresql, but we also use Interbase. However, at present there
> is a question mark over the future of Interbase (the top people have all
> resigned and we do not yet know what inprise will do with the product,
> there are rumours it will be dropped).
>
> Many users of Interbase are currently looking at alternatives. Of these
> Postgresql is in many ways one of the best options. It lacks only a few
> things
>
> critical (at least for some)
> - support for Windows 9x
This is a huge leap for us. Only if cgywin can be ported to it. That's
the only way we got to NT.
> - transaction log with roll forward from backups
That will be in 7.1, due in 6 months.
>
> desireable
> - stored procedures
Have it.
> - relational integrity via foreign keys
That will be in 7.0, due in a few months.
>
> Would it be possible to find ways to pay postgresql developers to add
> these things? We would be very happy to pay several $1000 for these and
> it might be possible to find others from the Interbase community.
Money always helps, but we already have most of what you need coming.
> I know that we have discussed Win 9x before and that there are technical
> issues. I am hoping that with funds ways around these could be found.
Win 9x seems like a HUGE leap for us. Where is cgywin on that?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Howie | 1999-12-22 18:38:18 | Re: [GENERAL] Interbase replacement |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-12-22 17:39:34 | Re: [GENERAL] Index pg_proc_prosrc_index: NUMBER OF INDEX' TUPLES (1071)ISNOT THE SAME AS HEAP' (1070) |