Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests.

From: "Thomas A(dot) Szybist" <szybist(at)boxhill(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: emkxp01(at)mtcc(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests.
Date: 1998-08-30 19:59:35
Message-ID: 199808301959.PAA03361@carmina.boxhill
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

In message <199808300008(dot)UAA15993(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian writes:
> > In message <199808292119(dot)WAA27374(at)mtcc(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>, Keith Parks writes:
> > >
> > > Thomas A. Szybist <szybist(at)boxhill(dot)com>
> > > >
> > > > Hi, yes, I'm having trouble as well.
> > >
> > > Sorry to hear that but I don't feel quite so alone now ;-)
> >
> > Misery loves company :).
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm crashing anytime I create a table, (-O2). I just tried the 8/29 snapshot.
> > > > I've got an environment set up now to try a few things.
> > >
> > > Same thing here with -O2, I think some of the other pg_user, pg_view etc.
> > > problems all boil down to table creation as those are created as
> > > tables after bootstrapping and subsequently converted to views.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Without -O2 it seem to be better. I see the same problem with
> > > > create function as you. Also many failures seem to the result
> > > > of some type not defined. Is that expected?
> > >
> > > Yes, there are many problems in the regression tests due to some
> > > type removal, I think, by Bruce. We're just waiting for the
> > > regression test "expected" results to catch up.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Sorry to jump in so late here.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Better late than never <grin>
> > >
> > > Just out of interest, what platform are you running on?
> > > (S/Linux on an SUN IPX here)
> > >
> > > Keith.
> > >
> >
> > This is on a Red Hat 4.1 (Yes 4.1) system. Thing is, it's a production
> > system, and I haven't reason to upgrade.
> >
> > Kernel is 2.0.29 gcc 2.7.2.1. Sparc 20.
> >
> > I was toying with the idea of tossing Red Had 5.1 on a sparc classic,
> > to see if glibc on S/Linux hoses anything.
>
> Again, if someone wants to conditionally compile the directories to find
> the offending file, I am sure we can get a fix for it.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
> maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
> + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
> + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
>

At first look it seems to be: backend/catalog/indexing.c.
Maybe Keith can confirm?

Thanks,

Tom Szybist
szybist(at)boxhill(dot)com

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-08-30 20:31:31 Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests.
Previous Message Massimo Dal Zotto 1998-08-30 19:46:19 Re: [HACKERS] pgindent for Monday