Re: BUG #2204: Feature Req: Unique output column names

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Brandon Black <blblack(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #2204: Feature Req: Unique output column names
Date: 2006-01-24 16:44:03
Message-ID: 19737.1138121043@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> It would be nice to have this text in HTML or info format. This PDF
> mess is really awkward.

Yeah, that's why I tend to look at SQL92 or SQL99 first ... I have those
drafts in plain-ASCII format, which is so much easier to grep and copy.
Would love to lay my hands on plain-ASCII SQL2003.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Pierre Pelletier 2006-01-24 16:56:45 Re: BUG #2178: NOT IN command don't work
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-01-24 16:39:21 Re: BUG #2204: Feature Req: Unique output column names