Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Version 7.0 beta problem

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Mark Jewiss <mark(dot)jewiss(at)knowledge(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Version 7.0 beta problem
Date: 2000-03-07 06:55:21
Message-ID: 19107.952412121@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Mark Jewiss writes:
>> mainloop.c:43: warning: variable `successResult' might be clobbered by `longjmp' or `vfork'

> I thought I had shut up those warnings by making the variables in question
> volatile. There's no need to worry about them since they're re-initialized
> right after the longjmp, but does anyone know how to shut up the compiler?

That *should* shut up these warnings. Maybe Mark is trying a slightly
back-dated beta version? I know you didn't have the "volatile"s in
there a few days ago.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-03-07 06:58:22 Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-03-07 06:51:32 Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update