Re: The argument for reinstating --as-needed

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The argument for reinstating --as-needed
Date: 2005-10-29 19:10:33
Message-ID: 18071.1130613033@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> At this stage, I am thinking this is best left for 8.2. It is
> impossible for us to test it enough.

Agreed --- the portability risks are way too high for 8.1.
I see no reason not to try it during the 8.2 cycle though.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-10-29 19:16:10 Re: The argument for reinstating --as-needed
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2005-10-29 19:04:33 Re: The argument for reinstating --as-needed