Re: [HACKERS] BUG #3799: csvlog skips some logs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: depesz <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] BUG #3799: csvlog skips some logs
Date: 2007-12-06 18:18:51
Message-ID: 17844.1196965131@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I can't see any very good reason for text logs to have different
> content from CSV logs.

Well, if we want to cram all that stuff in there, how shall we do it?
It seems wrong to put all those lines into one text field, but I'm
not sure I want to add six more text fields to the CSV format
either. Thoughts?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-12-06 21:02:21 Re: [HACKERS] BUG #3799: csvlog skips some logs
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-12-06 18:08:43 Re: [HACKERS] BUG #3799: csvlog skips some logs

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-12-06 18:22:19 Re: pg_dump and BINARY mode COPY
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-12-06 18:08:43 Re: [HACKERS] BUG #3799: csvlog skips some logs