Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings
Date: 2000-02-26 06:27:19
Message-ID: 17751.951546439@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> writes:
> Here's the test case:

Hmm. I get a rule string exceeding 8K out of this (in current sources),
as checked by breakpointing at InsertRule() in rewriteDefine.c and
looking at 'actiontree'.

What's your basis for asserting the rule is only ~ 1K?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message esling 2000-02-26 09:57:56 Web Site Opportunity for Database Expert
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-02-26 06:01:33 Re: [HACKERS] ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN