Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-documentation" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition
Date: 2006-10-25 14:58:31
Message-ID: 1645.1161788311@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> I think this is a good reason not to list *any* of the products by name
> in the documentation, but instead refer to a page on say techdocs that
> can be more easily updated.

I agree with that. If we have statements about other projects in our
docs, we will have a problem with not being able to update those
statements in a timely fashion when the other projects change.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-10-25 15:35:03 Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-10-25 14:35:03 Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-10-25 15:35:03 Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-10-25 14:45:25 Re: materialised view