From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway <Jorgen(dot)Austvik(at)Sun(dot)COM>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_regress: paths in largeobject test |
Date: | 2007-11-30 14:53:20 |
Message-ID: | 1628.1196434400@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I'd put it the other way around: likely we should get rid of the
>>> one use of @abs_builddir(at)(dot)
>>
>> Generally I prefer explicit over implicit (having the full paths make
>> troubleshooting easier), but in this case you have the additional aspect of
>> the lo_import operating relative to the client, while lo_export operates
>> relative to the server.
> I submit that the test is OK as it currently is.
Yeah, I hadn't thought about the different-paths aspect at the time of
making the above comment; but given that, it is correct as-is.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-11-30 20:22:07 | Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] plperl and regexps with accented characters - incompatible? |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-11-30 12:21:17 | Re: pg_regress: paths in largeobject test |