Re: How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
Date: 2008-05-23 13:20:21
Message-ID: 15673.1211548821@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> writes:
> Any word on 8.3.2 ?

Obviously, nothing is happening during PGCon ;-)

There was some discussion a week or so back about scheduling a set of
releases in early June, but it's not formally decided.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gurjeet Singh 2008-05-23 16:20:24 Random order of archiving files
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2008-05-23 12:48:02 Re: [HACKERS] Error while executing pg_dump "invalid memory alloc request size 4294967293"

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2008-05-28 12:25:14 Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2008-05-23 10:20:45 Re: How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work