Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgbench internal contention

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgbench internal contention
Date: 2011-08-03 13:29:54
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Maybe. But if that's the approach we want to use, let's just call it
>> pg_erand48 in the code, and dispense with the alias macros as well as
>> all vestiges of configure support.

> Works for me.  Just to confirm, that means we'd also change GEQO to
> use pg_erand48().

Right, that's what I was thinking.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter GeogheganDate: 2011-08-03 13:30:37
Subject: Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings
Previous:From: Petro MeierDate: 2011-08-03 13:19:06
Subject: PQescapeByteaConn - returns wrong string for PG9.1 Beta3

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group