Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Doc patch, put pg_temp into the documentation's index

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Doc patch, put pg_temp into the documentation's index
Date: 2012-11-17 23:10:12
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 2012-11-17 at 11:33 -0600, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> On 11/17/2012 12:19:02 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 11:10 -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > > pg_temp-toindex.patch
> > > Puts pg_temp into the index of the docs.
> > 
> > But there is no object called pg_temp.  It always pg_temp_NNNN
> > something.  How should that be indexed?
> My thought is not to index the db object; it isn't
> particularly interesting to a user.  Instead what's
> indexed is the token pg_temp, used when
> setting search_path.   The utility of the token is
> explained in several places in the docs.

Actually, since this is the pg_temp alias for the search path, it is
appropriate.  So committed as is.

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2012-11-18 00:35:34
Subject: Re: Do we need so many hint bits?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-11-17 21:57:49
Subject: Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group