Re: Re: Items missing from some context menus in object browser of v1.16 beta4

From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
To: Erwin Brandstetter <brandstetter(at)falter(dot)at>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Items missing from some context menus in object browser of v1.16 beta4
Date: 2012-09-23 13:57:16
Message-ID: 1348408636.11977.15.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 05:19 +0200, Erwin Brandstetter wrote:
> On 11.09.2012 19:41, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 02:04 +0200, Erwin Brandstetter wrote:
> >> On 05.09.2012 23:12, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 23:55 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 16:57 +0200, Erwin Brandstetter wrote:
> >>>>> On 27.08.2012 16:37, Erwin Brandstetter wrote:
> >>>>>> Aloha!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I think I ran into this regression with v1.16 beta4 and filed a ticket.
> >>>>>> So far I have seen this to affect indexes, primary keys and foreign keys
> >>>>>> But *not* tables, views, function, triggers, sequences or types ...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Added two small screenshots to the ticket to compare 1.4 and 1.16b4
> >>>>>> http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/ticket/377
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>> Erwin
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> I tried to add more details to the ticket, buthttp://code.pgadmin.org/trac/ decided to answer with error messages .. seems to be offline for now?
> >>>>> I'll add my findings here:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Also seems to affect foreign keys and unique indexes.
> >>>>> But *not* tables, views, function, triggers, sequences or types ...
> >>>>> Tested with PostgreSQL 9.1 and 8.4
> >>>>>
> >>>>> However, in seemingly arbitrary rare cases it works as it should. It's always the same for all objects under one table so far. I tried but failed to
> >>>>> spot a difference between the involved tables.
> >>>>>
> >>>> As you said, the trac site seems to be done right now, so I can't check
> >>>> your screenshots. I know there are some issues with the indexes right
> >>>> now. See the thread intitled "pgAdmin III commit: Lots of work on
> >>>> domains, and check constraints". I have a patch that may fix your
> >>>> issues, but can't check as I can't see your screenshots. I mostly need
> >>>> an answer from Dave, to know if I should apply my patch, or revert my
> >>>> older patch.
> >>>>
> >>> trac is available now, thanks to Dave.
> >>>
> >>> My patch fixes the issue you found.
> >> I have downloaded and tested with 1.16.0 (Sep 7 2012). I am afraid my results disagree, the regression is still there, all of it. Just like in the
> >> screenshot in the ticket.
> >>
> >> The other thing I reported seems fixed, though: "Bug in SQL script for indexes", where the SQL script used the table name instead of the schema name.
> >>
> > Then you should try to give me an SQL script that I can execute and that
> > will show the same issue. Because I tried again, and I don't have the
> > issue.
>
> It affects 9 out of 10 tables here. Just like the screenshots
> demonstrate. Items are missing from the context menu and the DEL key is
> not working.
> I have tried again an to find anything that would bind the rare cases
> where it works normally together, but no luck.
> If I recreate the table in another schema it stops to work.
> If I restart pgAdmin, the same tables exhibit normal behavior, so it's
> not totaly random.
> pgAdmin 1.14.3 does not display the problem.
>
> I fail to see how I could provide an SQL script.
> Maybe it's specific to Windows (XP)?

I fail to see how it could be specific to Windows. Apart from a
wxWidgets bug.

--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vladimir Kokovic 2012-09-23 15:02:06 Re: Information for added functionalities
Previous Message Guillaume Lelarge 2012-09-23 13:55:24 Re: [pgadmin-support] pgadmin crash - editing function body