From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Vinicius Santos <vinicius(dot)santos(dot)lista(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: More information about the selected objects |
Date: | 2012-07-14 16:44:47 |
Message-ID: | 1342284287.8088.44.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Sat, 2012-07-14 at 11:28 -0300, Vinicius Santos wrote:
>
> Not sure I like the point either. We don't have that notation
> on
> PostgreSQL. I think I would prefer something like "Retrieving
> details on
> table schema.table" and not say the database. Because if you
> add the
> database, someone will probably want also the server. It may
> not be
> usefull to you, but it'll come at some point. And that's quite
> a lot of
> informations.
>
> I agree.
>
>
>
> Probably we could add some status boxes in the status bar. For
> exemple,
> a box with a "user(at)database (server)" (with a lock icon if you
> use SSL
> for example. Just a thought.
>
>
>
> I liked the idea!
>
> We could add status boxes in front of the information "Retrieving
> details ...".
>
> For example, suppose that is the status bar:
>
> With 3 status boxes:
>
> || "Retrieving details on schema.table" || user(at)database || server ||
>
> or with 2 status boxes:
>
> || "Retrieving details on schema.table" || user(at)database ( server )
> ||
>
>
I think I like the second one better, but this is just my opinion.
--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vinicius Santos | 2012-07-14 17:14:34 | Re: More information about the selected objects |
Previous Message | Vinicius Santos | 2012-07-14 14:28:40 | Re: More information about the selected objects |