Re: ISO8601 nitpicking

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ISO8601 nitpicking
Date: 2012-02-24 12:45:25
Message-ID: 1330087525.32452.10.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tor, 2012-02-23 at 23:41 -0800, Daniel Farina wrote:
> As it turns out, evidence would suggests that the "ISO" output in
> Postgres isn't, unless there's an ISO standard for date and time that
> is referring to other than 8601.

Yes, ISO 9075, the SQL standard. This particular issue has been
discussed many times; see the archives.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rosario Borda 2012-02-24 12:47:01 Format of raw files
Previous Message Daniel Farina 2012-02-24 12:36:39 Re: pg_stat_statements normalization: re-review