On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 19:32 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 03/31/2011 07:25 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Most database connectors/frameworks nowadays support a URI style
> > connection string. Something like:
> > pgsql://user:pass(at)host/database
> > Do we think psql should support this style of connection string?
> Syntactic sugar aside, what is the advantage of that over a conninfo string?
I would think it would be purely syntatic sugar really, which does
incorporate a familiar interface for those who are working in different
worlds (.Net/Drupal/JAVA) etc...
Perhaps programability would also be useful from a shell/system script
Joshua D. Drake
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Greg Smith||Date: 2011-03-31 23:41:25|
|Subject: Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2011-03-31 23:32:32|
|Subject: Re: Should psql support URI syntax?|