Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL NetApp and NFS

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Chris Hoover <revoohc(at)gmail(dot)com>, PGSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL NetApp and NFS
Date: 2008-03-21 03:41:18
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Aside from what's said there, I'd note that it's a seriously bad idea
>> to use a "soft mount" or any arrangement wherein it's possible for
>> Postgres to be running while the NFS disk is not mounted.

> Do the docs need updating for this?

Wouldn't be a bad idea to mention it, if we're going to have a section
pointing out NFS risks.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Dawid KuroczkoDate: 2008-03-21 09:34:09
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL NetApp and NFS
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-03-21 03:30:01
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL NetApp and NFS

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group