Re: PostgreSQL NetApp and NFS

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Chris Hoover <revoohc(at)gmail(dot)com>, PGSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL NetApp and NFS
Date: 2008-03-21 03:41:18
Message-ID: 12727.1206070878@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Aside from what's said there, I'd note that it's a seriously bad idea
>> to use a "soft mount" or any arrangement wherein it's possible for
>> Postgres to be running while the NFS disk is not mounted.

> Do the docs need updating for this?

Wouldn't be a bad idea to mention it, if we're going to have a section
pointing out NFS risks.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dawid Kuroczko 2008-03-21 09:34:09 Re: PostgreSQL NetApp and NFS
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-21 03:30:01 Re: PostgreSQL NetApp and NFS