Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <adunstan(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert
Date: 2010-02-26 18:20:48
Message-ID: 1267208448.20134.1165.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 21:32 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 00:06 +0000, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > Log Message:
> > > -----------
> > > pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert the
> > > previous patch.
> >
> > I notice that the release notes talk about "parallel restore", yet the
> > word parallel is not used in the docs anywhere. The section on restoring
> > a dump makes no mention of this new facility,

The doc patch you applied does nothing to address these points

> nor does the perf tips
> > section.

Only that one.

> > Also says that the option doesn't work with --single-transaction, so we
> > should say that you've added in TRUNCATE to make the COPY go faster (or
> > haven't you? I know we discussed it).
>
> Good point. Documentation patch attached and applied.
>
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-02-26 18:25:04 Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-02-26 18:00:15 pgsql: Suggest gmake installcheck-world for pgindent testing.