On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 22:11 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Agreed. Simon has finished the pending items he had four weeks ago, but
> > the code clearly isn't ready for commit yet as new issues are cropping
> > up. And I think the way subtransactions are handled, which has been a
> > difficult part of the patch all along, still needs more thinking.
> Are there issues other than subtransactions?
I think his reply states that. The long and short is, what Tom was
concerned about is true and Heikki has confirmed it. This patch as nice
as it would be to have, isn't ready for prime time. It is time to push
this patch to 8.5, close up the rest of whatever is left with other
patches and move to Beta.
Joshua D. Drake
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2009-02-26 07:30:30|
|Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic
view update rules)|
|Previous:||From: Jaime Casanova||Date: 2009-02-26 06:56:19|
|Subject: Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1627)|