Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Outer joins and equivalence

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Outer joins and equivalence
Date: 2008-05-28 13:39:10
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 11:45 +0100, Matthew Wakeling wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2008, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > I do recognise that we would *not* be able to deduce this form of SQL
> >
> > A JOIN B ON ( = LEFT JOIN C ON ( =
> Surely that would not be valid SQL?

You are right, but my point was about inferences during SQL planning,
not about initial analysis of the statement.

 Simon Riggs 
 PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: tarcizioabDate: 2008-05-28 13:50:48
Subject: GEQO Benchmark
Previous:From: Matthew WakelingDate: 2008-05-28 10:45:14
Subject: Re: Outer joins and equivalence

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-05-28 14:10:06
Subject: Upcoming back-branch update releases
Previous:From: Dave CramerDate: 2008-05-28 12:25:14
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group