Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win32

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win32
Date: 2004-03-05 21:48:58
Message-ID: 11624.1078523338@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> * With -i and virtual_host: bind to specified address(es) only.

> Can you bind one socket to more than one address?

Nope. That's why we have provisions to listen on more than one socket.
I think that was implemented for virtual_host, but it'd be necessary
anyway for dual IPv4/IPv6 support.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-03-05 22:06:16 Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win32
Previous Message Dennis Haney 2004-03-05 21:32:03 Re: IN joining

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-03-05 22:06:16 Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win32
Previous Message jearl 2004-03-05 18:54:00 Re: [HACKERS] Tablespaces

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-03-05 21:55:55 Re: notice about costly ri checks (2)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-05 20:02:10 Re: Updated version of contrib/xml (at last)